×
The State of HR 2026 Report

AI & the
Filipino Workforce

A nationwide study on how artificial intelligence is reshaping work, wellbeing, and opportunity across 13 industries.

3,516Respondents
13Industries
46Questions
10Key Findings
Published July 2026·Estimated read: 6–8 minutes
Executive Summary

This study surveyed 3,516 employees to understand how artificial intelligence (AI) is being integrated into the workplace and how it relates to employee productivity, perceptions, and experiences at work.

Employees use AI most for
Communication27%
Information Processing23%
Decision-Making16%
78%
use AI in their daily work
Higher AI use is linked to:
Output
Faster Work
Less Stress
Recognition
However, only…
35%
receive role-specific AI training.

For HR leaders, AI adoption is no longer the primary challenge. The opportunity now is ensuring AI creates meaningful value for every employee by building practical skills, strengthening leadership support, and helping employees use AI thoughtfully rather than dependently.

10 Key Findings

Explore the report's ten most important discoveries.

01

Employees Most Commonly Use AI for Communication, Information Processing, and Decision-Making Tasks

02

Most Employees Use AI, But Most Still Lack Role-Specific Training

03

Construction, Transportation & Storage, and Human Health and Social Work Lead in Company-Level AI Adoption

04

Software Development, Program & Project Management, and Human Resources Report the Highest AI Use

05

AI's Greatest Impact May Be Reducing the Mental Burden of Work

06

Employees Report Greater Benefits from AI When They See It as Part of Their Success

07

Preference for AI in Decision-Making is Linked to Feeling Less Stressed

08

As Age and Tenure Increase, Self-Reported AI Benefits Decline

09

Job Security Perceptions Remain Stable

10

Employees are Concerned about Weakened Thinking Skills

01
Key Finding 01

Employees Most Commonly Use AI for Communication, Information Processing, and Decision-Making Tasks

We asked employees to identify the three work tasks for which they most frequently use AI. They mentioned:

  • Communication and interaction (27%)
  • Information processing (23%)
  • Thinking and decision-making (16%)

These are summarized in Figure 1 below. Employees reported the same top use cases regardless of industry, job function, company size, work arrangement, organizational rank, generation, or tenure.

Figure 1.Most Common Tasks Employees Use AI For

Most Common Work Tasks Employees Use AI For

Communication & Interaction
27%
Information Processing
23%
Thinking & Decision-Making
16%
Computer & Digital Tasks
12%
Management & Coordination
7%
Service & Care Tasks
6%
Creative & Content Creation
5%
Physical & Operational Tasks
4%
#1
27%
Communication & Interaction

Employees use AI to draft, summarize, and improve written and verbal communication.

Common examples
Email draftingMeeting summariesMessaging assistanceTranslation
Mental Health Insights

"For HR leaders, this shift requires close monitoring, as AI can mask a presenteeism crisis by allowing disengaged or burned-out employees to rapidly submit highly polished work."

02
Key Finding 02

Most Employees Use AI, But Most Still Lack Role-Specific Training

We asked employees whether their company provides role-specific AI upskilling programs. We found that only 35% reported that their organizations offer such programs, while 29% said their companies do not. Another 36% were unsure. Figure 2 summarizes this distribution.

Our findings do not necessarily mean that no AI training exists within these companies. Some organizations may provide generic AI training but have not tailored it to specific role-based tasks. The large share of employees who are unsure also indicates a gap in visibility or communication of existing AI learning programs. This presents opportunities for organizations to both expand role-specific AI upskilling and improve awareness of existing training programs.

Figure 2.Provision of Role-Specific AI Upskilling Programs

Does your company provide role-specific AI upskilling? (N=3,516)

0%
YesCompany provides role-specific AI upskilling programs
0%
Not sureUnsure whether their company offers such programs
0%
NoCompany does not provide role-specific AI upskilling
Mental Health Insights

"Leaving 65% of the workforce without targeted AI training triggers professional anxiety and operational strain, directly fueling high workplace rates of exhaustion and concentration drops."

03
Key Finding 03

Companies in Construction, Transportation and Storage, and Human Health and Social Work Reported the Highest Proportion of AI Adoption Within Their Industries

Figure 3.Reported Company AI Adoption Rate by Industry

Company-Level AI Adoption by Industry — % High Adopters

HighMediumLow
Construction
89.1%
Transportation and Storage
86.4%
Human Health and Social Work Activities
86.1%
Wholesale and Retail Trade
85.5%
Finance and Insurance Activities
85.4%
Accommodation and Food Services
83.9%
Real Estate Activities
83.1%
Information and Communication
82.5%
Administrative and Support Services
82%
Education
80.1%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
74.1%
Professional, Scientific and Technical Services
73.9%
Manufacturing
72.4%

We found that companies in Construction (89%), Transportation and Storage (86%), and Human Health and Social Work Activities (86%) have the highest reported AI adoption rates. In contrast, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation (74%), Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (74%), and Manufacturing (72%), have the lowest. Figure 3 shows the comparison of company AI adoption rates across industries.

04
Key Finding 04

Employees in Software Development, Program and Project Management, and Human Resources Reported the Highest Proportion of AI Usage Within Their Job Functions

Figure 4.Reported Employee AI Use Rate by Job Function

AI Adoption Tier Groups by Job Function — % High Users

Software Development
95%
Program and Project Management
87.8%
Human Resources
85.9%
Business Development
82.7%
Community and Social Services
82.5%
Marketing
82.3%
IT
82.1%
Consulting
81.6%
Research and Development
81.5%
Legal and Compliance
81.1%
Customer Support
80.6%
Sales
80.2%
Media and Communications
80%
Operations and Administration
78.3%
Protective Services
77.8%
Education
77.4%
Real Estate and Property
77.3%
Supply Chain and Logistics
75.4%
Finance and Accounting
74.4%
Product Management
72.4%
Environment and Safety
72.2%
Arts and Design
71.6%
Quality Assurance and Control
71.1%
Engineering
69.6%
Healthcare Services
66.9%

We found that Software Development (95%), Program and Project Management (88%), and Human Resources (86%) have the highest proportions of AI users. Meanwhile, Quality Assurance and Control (71%), Engineering (70%), and Healthcare Services (67%) have the lowest reported AI usage.

Key Finding 05

AI's Greatest Impact May Be
Reducing the Mental Burden of Work

Daily AI
Usage
M=3.00 · High
More
Output
Faster
Work
Less
Overtime
Less
Stress
More
Recognition

All five outcomes are positively associated with daily AI use frequency across 3,516 respondents.

We found that AI is already part of employees’ daily work, and that higher usage is consistently associated with better AI performance outcomes and lower stress from work because of AI. Employees who use AI more frequently tend to work faster and produce more output because of AI, experience less stress due to AI, and report fewer overtime hours. Higher AI-driven output is also associated with feeling more recognized at work, suggesting both performance and employee experience benefits.

We found that AI is already part of employees' daily work, and that higher usage is consistently associated with better AI performance outcomes and lower stress from work because of AI. Employees who use AI more frequently tend to work faster and produce more output because of AI, experience less stress due to AI, and report fewer overtime hours. Higher AI-driven output is also associated with feeling more recognized at work, suggesting both performance and employee experience benefits.

*M stands for median and is used throughout this document. Interpretation: 1.00–1.75 = very low, 1.76–2.50 = low, 2.51–3.25 = high, 3.26–4.00 = very high.

Mental Health Insights

"The link between daily AI utilization, shorter execution speeds, and reduced overtime acts as an excellent operational buffer against general emotional distress."

06
Key Finding 06

Employees Report Greater Benefits from AI When They See It as Part of Their Success

Employees' perceptions of AI are linked to how effectively they use it. When employees see AI not as an added tool, but as something connected to their own success at work, they are more likely to report higher output using AI. This highlights the role of mindset in driving performance outcomes.

Positive AI Mindset
Sees AI as important
to work success
Higher AI Output
Generates more output
when using AI at work

Supporting Finding

  • Employees who perceive AI as important to their work success produce more output with AI.
Mental Health Insights

"When framing AI as a threat rather than a career asset, companies trigger a defensive detachment where teams use tools for compliance while remaining completely checked out."

07
Key Finding 07

Preference for AI in Decision-Making is Linked to Feeling Less Stressed

AI Trust in Decisions
Prefers AI assistance at high-cognitive moments
is linked to
↓ Work-Related Stress
Better psychological outcomes at work

Employees who prefer to use AI when making decisions at work report lower levels of stress because of their AI use. This suggests that AI may be doing more than speeding up decisions; rather, it may be reducing the cognitive pressure employees feel when making them.

Supporting Findings

  1. Employees who prefer AI assistance in decision-making are less stressed with work because of AI.
Mental Health Insights

"Embracing AI as a supportive partner in decision-making serves as a practical application of Augmented Intelligence, which unloads the heavy cognitive burden that may contribute to focus deficits and confusion."

08
Key Finding 08

As Age and Tenure Increase, Self-Reported AI Benefits Decline

As employee age and tenure increase, respondents are less likely to report that AI improves their productivity, reduces work-related stress, or contributes to recognition for their work.

Employees' reported experiences with AI are not evenly distributed across the workforce. While AI use is generally associated with greater productivity and psychological ease, reported AI-related benefits decline as employee age and tenure increase.

As employee age and tenure increase, respondents are less likely to report that AI helps them produce more output, work faster, reduce work-related stress, or contribute to recognition for AI-enabled productivity gains. These findings describe respondents' self-reported experiences with AI rather than an objective measure of AI's effectiveness.

01
AI Use↓ lower for older employees
02
Output with AI↓ less effective with age
03
Work Speed↓ takes longer for older employees
04
Stress Relief↓ less pronounced for older employees
05
AI Importance↓ less important to older employees
06
Recognition↓ less recognized for older employees
Mental Health Insights

"Older and longer-tenured workers face cognitive adjustments when tech rollouts disrupt well-established non-automated habits, creating technical challenges that are naturally present during technology transitions. HR leaders may design age-inclusive, role-specific training paired with relatable peer mentors to preserve psychological safety."

Key Finding 09

Job Security Perceptions Remain Stable

4.00 Very High3.00 High2.00 Low1.00 Very Low
HIGH

Employees generally feel secure in their jobs despite AI being integrated in the workplace. Perceptions are consistent across groups.

Job security remains a strength area in the age of AI.
  1. Employees feel secure in their jobs despite AI developments (high, M=3.00).
  2. Job security perceptions remain consistent across tenure, generation, rank, work setup, and company size.
Mental Health Insights

"MindYou's behavioral data suggests that even secure employees may be susceptible to presenteeism, where employees are physically present but may be psychologically detached from their daily responsibilities. HR may implement reflective check-ins and open communication spaces that fulfill the fundamental human need for connection."

Key Finding 10

Employees are Concerned about Weakened Thinking Skills

4.00 Very High3.00 High2.00 Low1.00 Very Low
LOW

Employees feel worried that relying on AI weakens their thinking skills — a concern of cognitive atrophy due to mental offloading onto AI.

Employees want AI to enhance, not erode, their thinking abilities.
  1. Employees report that reliance on AI makes them feel their thinking skills are weakening (low, M=2.00).
WHO WE SURVEYED

Meet Our Respondents

A diverse cross-section of 3,516 Filipino employees
across company sizes, job levels, and work arrangements.

3,516
Respondents
Across the Philippines
GENERATION
51%
Millennials (30–45 years old)

The sample was primarily composed of Millennials (51%) and Gen Z employees (42%), while Generation X (6%) and Boomers (1%) accounted for smaller proportions of respondents.

Millennials (30–45 years old)51%
Gen Z (14–29 years old)42%
Gen X (46–61 years old)6%
Boomers (62–80 years old)1%
93% of respondents are under 46 years old
JOB RANK
79%
79%
Rank-and-file
Rank-and-file
79%
Supervisor / Team Leader
13%
Manager
5%
C-Level, Head, Director
3%
COMPANY SIZE
60%
60%
Enterprise (301+ employees)
Enterprise (301+ employees)
60%
SME (11–300 employees)
37%
Micro (1–10 employees)
3%
WORK SETUP
30%
30%
Entirely Onsite
Entirely Onsite
30%
Entirely Remote
26%
Mostly Onsite
24%
Mostly Remote
20%
The AI Maturity Journey

Nine recommendations mapped to five stages of AI adoption in HR.

AI CULTURESUMMIT1FoundationSTART HERE2InclusionBRIDGE GAPS3EnablementSCALE USAGE4MasteryDEEPEN VALUE5CulturePINNACLE
STAGE 1 — FOUNDATION
01Prioritize adopting AI as a standard work enabler rather than an optional tool
Start Here

Your AI journey doesn't end with adoption. It starts there.

This report highlights where Philippine organizations stand today. The next question is where your organization goes from here.

Find the right AI use cases

Identify opportunities that drive the most business value.

Build employee confidence

Equip your people with the skills and mindset to embrace AI.

Scale adoption across teams

Embed AI into workflows and drive sustainable adoption.

Whether you're exploring AI for the first time or looking to deepen adoption across your workforce, Sprout can help you navigate the practical challenges of implementation, from identifying high-impact opportunities to building employee confidence and sustainable adoption. Let's discuss how your organization can take the next step.

Methodology
3,516Respondents
13Industries
46Survey Questions
30.89%Completion Rate
May 8–292026 Field Period
Linear Reg.Analysis Method
Survey Launched
May 8, 2026
Distribution
Sprout · Facebook · LinkedIn
Started
11,383 respondents
Completed
3,516 respondents
Completion Rate
30.89%
First 400 eligible respondents received Grab vouchers as an incentive for participation.
[ ANNEX ]
Operational Definitions of Industries

Industry definitions are based on the Philippine Standard Industrial Classification (PSIC) Sections of the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA).

Organizations that provide short-term accommodation, meals, and beverages for immediate consumption.

Examples: Hotels, resorts, restaurants, cafés, catering companies, fast-food chains

Organizations that provide administrative, operational, and support services to businesses and individuals.

Examples: BPO firms, recruitment agencies, call centers, facilities management providers, travel agencies

Organizations engaged in cultural, artistic, entertainment, sports, and recreational activities.

Examples: Museums, theaters, concert venues, sports clubs, gaming centers, theme parks

Organizations involved in the construction, renovation, repair, and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure.

Examples: Construction contractors, infrastructure developers, engineering and construction firms

Organizations that provide educational instruction, training, and learning services.

Examples: Schools, universities, colleges, technical and vocational training institutions

Organizations that provide financial intermediation, investment, and insurance services.

Examples: Banks, insurance companies, investment firms, fintech companies

Organizations that provide healthcare, medical treatment, and social assistance services.

Examples: Hospitals, clinics, diagnostic centers, rehabilitation facilities, social welfare organizations

Organizations engaged in information technology, telecommunications, publishing, broadcasting, and related communication services.

Examples: Software companies, telecommunications providers, media companies, internet service providers

Organizations engaged in the physical or chemical transformation of materials into new products.

Examples: Food manufacturers, electronics manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, consumer goods manufacturers

Organizations providing specialized professional, scientific, technical, or advisory services requiring advanced expertise.

Examples: Consulting firms, law firms, accounting firms, research organizations, engineering consultancies

Organizations involved in buying, selling, leasing, developing, and managing real estate properties.

Examples: Property developers, real estate brokerages, property management firms

Organizations engaged in the transport of passengers or freight and the storage of goods.

Examples: Airlines, shipping companies, logistics providers, trucking companies, warehouse operators

Organizations engaged in the sale of goods to businesses (wholesale) or directly to consumers (retail).

Examples: Supermarkets, department stores, convenience stores, wholesalers, e-commerce retailers

[ ANNEX ]
References
Web Article

Gorton, D. (2026). Understand industry classifications and their role in investing. In Investopedia.

investopedia.com
Government

Philippine Statistics Authority [PSA]. (2019). 2019 Updates to the 2009 Philippine Standard Industrial Classification. Philippine Statistics Authority.

psa.gov.ph
Conference Paper

Abutar, A. J. D. C., Avanzado, A. J. D., Bongga, R. L., Pedenes, D. D. D., & Samson, M. I. R. (2025). Analysis of the mental workload of inbound voice contact center agents under the hybrid work set up in the Philippines. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 1–12. IEOM Society International.

doi.org
White Paper

Ferrer, P., & Marshall, Y. (2026). White Paper 1: The Mind You App and Technological Infrastructure. Mind You Mental Health Systems Inc.

drive.google.com
White Paper

Mind You Mental Health Systems Inc. (2025a). White Paper 2: Insights from the Employee Mental Health Assessment (EMHA) and PHQ-9. Mind You Mental Health Systems Inc.

drive.google.com
White Paper

Mind You Mental Health Systems Inc. (2025a). White Paper 3: Insights from the Mind and Body Tool: Understanding the Link Between Physical and Mental Health in the Workplace. Mind You Mental Health Systems Inc.

drive.google.com
White Paper

Mind You Mental Health Systems Inc. (2025b). White Paper 4: Workplace Mental Health Across Industries: Insights from PHQ-9 Data. Proprietary Evaluation Report.

State of HR 2026 SummitState of HR 2026 Summit

You've only seen the first three findings. Access the remaining insights from 3,500+ employees, including the biggest drivers of AI adoption, productivity, stress, and workforce readiness.

Scroll to Top

You've seen where AI is. See where it's going.

Unlock all 10 key findings, FREE. Just tell us who's reading.